Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia Condari Pty Ltd v Haus Group Australia Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 65 File number:
Judgment of: ROFE J
Date of judgment: 7 February 2025
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – form of orders COSTS – costs arising from application to review the decision of a Registrar – where trial was vacated two weeks prior to its intended commencement – whether the conduct of the applicant warrants the award of indemnity costs – whether costs should be payable forthwith
Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Directed Electronics OE Pty Ltd v Isuzu Australia Limited (No 3) [2024] FCA 1413 Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan (No 2) [2000] FCA 1220 Cases cited: LFDB v SM (No 2) [2017] FCAFC 207 Federal Treasury Enterprise (FKP) Sojuzplodoimport v Spirits International BV (No 5) [2018] FCA 19 Lanzer v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (No 2) [2021] FCA 1321
Division: General Division
Registry: Victoria
National Practice Area:
Sub-area:
Number of paragraphs: 59
Date of last submissions: Applicant: 27 November 2024 Respondent: 4 December 2024
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Counsel for the Applicant: G Jardine
Solicitor for the Applicant: Patten Robins Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: G Mukherji
Solicitor for the Respondent: Nicholson Ryan Lawyers
ORDERS VID 159 of 2021
BETWEEN: CONDARI PTY LTD ACN 056 577 765 Applicant AND: HAUS GROUP AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ACN 154 239 933 Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate