Federal Court of Australia
ACN 117 641 004 Pty Ltd (in liq) v S&P Global, Inc (No 4) [2025] FCA 72 File number(s): NSD 881 of 2020 NSD 73 of 2021
Judgment of: SHARIFF J
Date of judgment: 12 February 2025
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – expert evidence – admissibility – complex class action and investor proceedings – interlocutory application made under s 192A of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) for advance rulings on the admissibility of expert evidence – where ruling on admissibility necessarily involves the resolution of pleading issues in contest – whether the determination of admissibility should be deferred until trial – where objections taken to the entirety of certain expert reports on grounds of relevance – whether the opinions expressed based on expertise or specialised knowledge – whether opinions seek to impermissibly describe and interpret documents - whether experts lacked the expertise necessary to opine on what matters would be "obvious" to industry participants – whether expert reports failed to disclose adequate reasoning to support the conclusions drawn – whether it is in the interests of case management principles to permit multiple experts to be asked the same or similar questions – whether expert opinions relevant to counterfactual case
Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 76(1), 192A Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37M, 37P(3)(c) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 16.42
Australian Securities & Investments Commission v Vines [2003] NSWSC 1095; (2003) 48 ACSR 291 Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) v Cassimatis (No 5) [2016] FCA 612; (2016) 343 ALR 358 Australian Securities and Investments Commission, re Whitebox Trading Pty Ltd v Whitebox Trading Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 324 B&K Holdings (Qld) Pty Ltd v Garmin Australasia Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 64; (2019) 134 ACSR 404 Bailey v Director-General, Department of Natural Resources [2013] NSWSC 515 Berry v CCL Secure Pty Ltd [2020] HCA 27; (2020) 271 CLR 151 Clark v Ryan [1960] HCA42; (1960) 103 CLR 486 Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar [2011] HCA 21; (2011) 243 CLR 588 Davaria v 7-Eleven Stores Pty Ltd (No 9) [2021] FCA 473 Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337 Evans v The Queen [2007] HCA 59; (2007) 235 CLR 521 Festa v The Queen [2001] HCA 72; (2001) 208 CLR 593 Franklin v Regina [2021] NSWCCA 260 Gondarra v Minister for Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs [2012] FCA 185; (2012) 127 ALD 288 Cases cited: Herron v HarperCollins Publishers Australia Pty Ltd [2022] FCAFC 68; (2022) 292 FCR 336 Honeysett v The Queen [2014] HCA 29; (2014) 253 CLR 122 John McGrath Motors (Canberra) Pty Ltd v Applebee [1964] HCA 1; (1964) 110 CLR 656 Lambert Leasing Inc v QBE Insurance Australia Ltd [2012] NSWSC 953 Lock, in the matter of Cedenco JV Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2) [2019] FCA 93 Lucantonio v Kleinert [2009] NSWSC 853 Magill v Magill [2006] HCA 51; (2006) 226 CLR 551 MB v Protective Commissioner [2000] NSWSC 718; (2000) 217 ALR 631 McNickle v Huntsman Chemical Co Australia Pty Ltd (Expert Evidence) [2021] FCA 370 NA & J Investments Pty Ltd v Minister Administering Water Management Act 2000 [2012] NSWLEC 120 Novartis AG v Pharmacor Pty Ltd [2022] FCAFC 58; (2022) 290 FCR 345 Re Whitebox Trading Ltd [2017] FCA 324 Sydneywide Distributors Pty Ltd v Red Bull Australia Pty Ltd [2002] FCAFC 157; (2002) 234 FCR 549 The Owners - Strata Plan No 90189 v Parkview Constructions Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 1382 Wingecarribee Shire Council & Ors v Lehman Brothers Australia Ltd (ACN 066 797 760) (in Liq) [2012] FCA 1028; (2012) 301 ALR 1 at [313]
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate