Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Bekier (Separate Relief Hearing) [2025] FCA 84 File number: NSD 1082 of 2022
Judgment of: LEE J
Date of judgment: 5 February 2025
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – referral and reallocation of aspect of proceeding to another judge – apprehended bias – issue of apprehended bias not yet crystallised – reallocation to be made – scope of current part heard matter
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 1317E(1)
Cases cited: Charisteas v Charisteas [2021] HCA 29; (2021) 273 CLR 289 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 3; (2000) 205 CLR 337
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Number of paragraphs: 17
Date of hearing: 5 February 2025
Counsel for the plaintiff: Dr R Higgins SC with Ms S Patterson
Solicitor for the plaintiff: Norton Rose Fulbright
Counsel for the first defendant: Mr J Entwisle
Solicitor for the first defendant: Gilbert + Tobin
Counsel for the second defendant: Mr P Wood with Mr B Hancock
Solicitor for the second defendant: Gadens Lawyers
Counsel for the third defendant: Mr A Dinelli KC with Ms S Kearney
Solicitor for the third defendant: Hall & Wilcox
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate