Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Telstra Limited [2025] FCA 93 File number:
Judgment of: SNADEN J
Date of judgment: 21 February 2025
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – where respondent a telecommunications business offering NBN internet access plans to consumers – where respondent unilaterally and without notice made changes to some consumers' plans – where changes resulted in slower upload speed – whether respondent made representations to consumers as to plan's standard, quality, value, grade or performance characteristics – whether respondent engaged in conduct that was misleading or deceptive – whether respondent made false or misleading representations – whether respondent contravened provisions of the Australian Consumer Law – hearing on liability – liability for contraventions established.
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law ss 18, 29(1)(b), 29(1)(g)
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cornerstone Investment Aust Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 4) [2018] FCA 1408 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v LG Electronics Australia Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1047 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v LG Electronics Australia Pty Ltd [2018] FCAFC 96 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Mazda Australia Pty Ltd (2021) 158 ACSR 31 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 640 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (2020) 278 FCR 450 Cases cited: Campbell v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd (2009) 238 CLR 304 Campomar Sociedad, Limitada v Nike International Ltd (2000) 202 CLR 45 Demagogue Pty Ltd v Ramensky (1992) 39 FCR 31 Gardam v George Wills & Co Ltd (1988) 82 ALR 415 Google Inc v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2013) 249 CLR 435 Miller & Associates Insurance Broking Pty Ltd v BMW Australia Finance Ltd (2010) 241 CLR 357 Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 191 Rhone-Poulenc Agrochimie SA v UIM Chemical Services Pty Ltd (1986) 12 FCR 477
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate