Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia Zhang v Zhang (No 2) [2025] FCA 98 File number(s):
Judgment of: NESKOVCIN J
Date of judgment: 19 February 2025
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – freezing orders – where material change of circumstances since the application for freezing orders – whether circumstances justified variation of freezing orders to require payment into court – order made for payment into court
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 1335 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 7.32, 7.33, 19.01
Brimaud v Honeysett Instant Print Pty Ltd (1988) 217 ALR 44 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Shi (2021) 273 CLR 235; [2021] HCA 22 Dura (Australia) Constructions Pty Ltd (in liq) v Hue Boutique Living Pty Ltd (2014) 49 VR 86 at 98-99; [2014] VSCA 326 Guo v Xu [2021] NSWSC 460 Jackson v Sterling Industries Ltd (1987) 162 CLR 612; [1987] HCA 23 Cases cited: Millenium Federation Pty Ltd v Bigjig Pty Ltd [2000] 1 Qd R 275, [1998] QCA 432 Sleiman v Afeich [2005] NSWSC 1063 Viterra BV v Shandong Ruyi Technology Group Company Ltd [2022] FCA 215 Waters v Commonwealth of Australia [2017] FCA 312 Yukong Line Ltd of Korea v Rendsberg Investments Corp of Liberia [2001] 2 Lloyd's Rep 113 Zhang v Zhang [2023] FCA 1660
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate