Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Inspector-General in Bankruptcy v Hartnett [2025] FCA 111 File number(s):
Judgment of: DOWNES J
Date of judgment: 24 February 2025
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – application pursuant to section 222(1) Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) to set aside personal insolvency agreement entered pursuant to Part X of that Act – meaning of "in force" in section 222(1) – whether the terms of the agreement are unreasonable or are not calculated to benefit the creditors generally – whether any other reason to set aside the agreement – sequestration order sought by creditor pursuant to section 222(10) Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) – where first respondent arranged for invoices to be issued in his name and arranged for those purported creditors to vote in favour of personal insolvency agreement – where major creditor which voted in favour of personal insolvency agreement was a related party controlled by the first respondent's spouse – where controlling trustees were not provided with complete information – finding of abuse of process by first respondent – personal insolvency agreement set aside and sequestration order made
Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 222, 222(1), 222(2), 222(8), 222(10), 222(11) Legislation: Bankruptcy Legislation Amendment Act 2004 (Cth) s 142 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 56(2), 78, 136 Insolvency Practice Rules (Bankruptcy) 2016 (Cth) r 75-132(1)
Alexiou v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (Application to Amend Pleading) [2025] FCA 7 Beau Timothy John Hartnett trading as Hartnett Lawyers v Anthony Robert Bell as Executor of the Estate of the late Mabel Dawn Deakin-Bell (No 2) (2023) 113 NSWLR 381; [2023] NSWCA 311 Bell v Hartnett Lawyers (No 3) (2022) 112 NSWLR 463; [2022] NSWSC 1204 Hingston v Westpac Banking Corporation (2012) 200 FCR 493; [2012] FCAFC 41 Cases cited: Moss v Gunns Finance Pty Ltd (2018) 131 ACSR 462; [2018] FCAFC 185 Mouglalis v Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Ltd (2017) 250 FCR 92; [2017] FCAFC 47 New Age Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd v Etlis (2013) 11 ABC (NS) 542; [2013] FCA 884 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 Ritson v Commissioner of Police (NSW) [2021] FCAFC 208 Tamaya Resources Ltd (in liq) v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu [2015] FCA 1098
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate