Federal Court of Australia
Federal Court of Australia
Edwards v Nine Network Australia Pty Limited (No 7) [2025] FCA 137 File number(s): NSD 129 of 2022
Judgment of: WIGNEY J
Date of judgment: 18 February 2025
Date of publication of reasons: 26 February 2025
Catchwords: COSTS – where lump sum costs amount agreed between applicant and respondents – where dispute between applicant and intervener as to distribution of lump sum costs amount – where dispute between applicant and intervener as to whether the intervener has a solicitor's equitable lien over lump sum costs amount – order that lump sum costs amount be paid into court pending resolution of dispute between applicant and intervener
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37AI(1) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 2.32(3)(a)
Cases cited: Edwards v Nine Network Australia Pty Limited (No 5) [2024] FCA 422 Edwards v Nine Network Australia Pty Limited (No 6) [2024] FCA 758 Firth v Centrelink [2002] NSWSC 564; 55 NSWLR 4512
Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Other Federal Jurisdiction
Number of paragraphs: 12
Date of hearing: 18 February 2025
Counsel for applicant: G Edwards
Solicitor for respondents: Bird & Bird
Counsel for intervener: M Castle
Solicitor for intervener: Rose Legal
ORDERS NSD 129 of 2022
BETWEEN: GINA EDWARDS Applicant
AND: NINE NETWORK AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED First Respondent
TCN CHANNEL NINE PTY LIMITED Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate