Federal Court of Australia
CATCHWORDS
INDUSTRIAL LAW - termination of employment - jurisdiction of Court - meaning of "relevant wages" - whether commission is included.
Industrial Relations Act 1988, s.170CD, and s.170EE.
Ardino -v- Count Financial Group Pty Ltd (Industrial Relations Court of Australia, Wilcox CJ, 14 November 1994, unreported)
Mutual Acceptance Co. Ltd -v- The Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1944) 69 CLR 389
Commissioner of Payroll Tax -v- Reserve Bank of Australia (1986) 66 ALR 677
Shields -v- Commissioner of Payroll Tax (1989) 98 ALR 559
THOMAS GORDON BROWN -v- LISTAGLEN PTY LTD
NO. VI 1072 of 1994
Before: MURPHY JR
Place: MELBOURNE
Date: 21 December 1994
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
VI 1072 of 1994
BETWEEN:
THOMAS GORDON BROWN Applicant
AND
LISTAGLEN PTY LTD Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
21 December 1994 Judicial Registrar Murphy
In the course of the hearing of this proceeding the Respondent raised a jurisdictional issue namely that the Court had no jurisdiction to hear this matter under s.170CD of the Industrial Relations Act ("the Act"), because the Applicant's relevant wages for the period of his employment exceeded the amount calculated pursuant to s.170CD(1)(b). I ruled against the Respondent and stated that I would publish my reasons at a later date. I now publish those reasons.
Background
The Applicant had been employed by the Respondent as a used car manager, commencing 28 March 1994. His employment was terminated on 4 July 1994. His remuneration arrangements were as follows. He was paid a retainer of $800.00 per week. In addition he was paid commission at the rate of $25.00 per vehicle sold and 10% of the profits of the used car division. Over the period that he was employed he was paid a total amount of salary and commissions of $17,521.00. The Respondent calculated that, based on the number of days that he was employed, if his total earnings exceeded $16,438.36 then he was excluded under s.170CD(1)(b).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate