Johnson v Halsmoree Pty Ltd [1995] IRCA 233

CATCHWORDS Industrial Law - employment - unlawful termination - whether applicants employed and if so on what terms - whether employment terminated by the employer - whether termination harsh unjust or unreasonable - no point of principle involved. Matter No. DI 104 of 1994 ANNETTE LOUISE JOHNSON v HALSMOREE PTY LTD Matter No. DI 105 of 1994 BRYANT GEORGE v HALSMOREE PTY LTD VON DOUSSA J DARWIN 31 MAY 1995

INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COURT ) ) OF AUSTRALIA ) ) NORTHERN TERRITORY ) ) DISTRICT REGISTRY ) MATTER NO. DI 104 OF 1994 BETWEEN: ANNETTE LOUISE JOHNSON Applicant AND: HALSMOREE PTY LTD Respondent MINUTES OF ORDER JUDGE MAKING ORDER : VON DOUSSA J PLACE ORDER MADE : DARWIN DATE ORDER MADE : 31 MAY 1995 THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Declaration that the employment of the applicant with the respondent was terminated on 8 April 1994 by the respondent in contravention of the provisions of Division 3 of Part VIA of the Industrial Relations Act 1988. 2. The respondent pay to the applicant the sum of $19,000. Note: Settlement and entry of order are dealt with by Order 36 of the Industrial Relations Court Rules.

INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COURT ) ) OF AUSTRALIA ) ) NORTHERN TERRITORY ) ) DISTRICT REGISTRY ) MATTER NO. DI 105 OF 1994 BETWEEN: BRYANT GEORGE Applicant AND: HALSMOREE PTY LTD Respondent MINUTES OF ORDER JUDGE MAKING ORDER : VON DOUSSA J PLACE ORDER MADE : DARWIN DATE ORDER MADE : 31 MAY 1995 THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Declaration that the employment of the applicant with the respondent was terminated on 8 April 1994 by the respondent in contravention of the provisions of Division 3 of Part VIA of the Industrial Relations Act 1988. 2. The respondent pay to the applicant the sum of $19,000. Note: Settlement and entry of order are dealt with by Order 36 of the Industrial Relations Court Rules.