Federal Court of Australia
DECISION NO: 482/96 IN THE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY WI 1256 of 1996 B E T W E E N: ADAM G BROWN
1st Applicant
A N D:
AUSTRALIAN WORKERS UNION
2nd Applicant
A N D:
SEDCO FOREX INTERNATIONAL DRILLING INC
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 10 OCTOBER 1996 BOON JR
INTRODUCTION
This is an application under section 170EA of the Industrial Relations Act 1988 (C'th) ("the Act"). The applicant employee, Adam Brown, is seeking payment of compensation arising out of the alleged unlawful termination of his employment by the respondent, Sedco Forex International Drilling Inc ("Sedco").
Sedco's position is that this Court has no jurisdiction to hear and determine the matter, as it says that there was no termination of Mr Brown's employment at the initiative of the employer. Further, Sedco says that if it is found that this Court does have jurisdiction, there was a valid reason, in any event, for the termination of Mr Brown's employment.
Mr Brown and the Australian Workers Union ("AWU") deny that there was no termination at the initiative of the employer, and state that there was no valid reason for the termination of Mr Brown's employment.
THE EVIDENCE
Sedco carries on the business of offshore oil and gas exploration drilling. It has a Perth office which conducts some administrative work.
Mr Brown is 30 years old, and commenced employment with Sedco on its 702 offshore drilling rig as a floorman from 18 June 1994.
On 26 June 1994, Mr Brown injured his shoulder whilst at work. From then on, Mr Brown received workers compensation payments under the provisions of the Workers Compensation and Assistance Act 1981 (WA) until he received the maximum amount payable under the provisions of that Act.
Mr Brown was placed on a rehabilitation program based in Adelaide, which is his usual place of residence, from 15 July 1994 until mid-1995. Mr Brown's family and friends live in Adelaide and he owns a property there. He has two mortgages.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate