Federal Court of Australia
DECISION NO:102/97 CATCHWORDS
INDUSTRIAL LAW
Wilson -v- IPC (IRCA Moore J, 67 IR 302) APESMA & Carl Sparre -v- David Graphics Pty Limited (Unreported Wilcox CJ 12 July 1995, Decision Number 410/95) Liddell -v- Lembke (1 IRCA 466)
Melide -v- Rethmann NI 1996 of 1996
Before: MCILWAINE JR Place: SYDNEY Date/s of hearing: 15-16 JANUARY 1997 Date of judgment: 16 JANUARY 1997
IN THE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
NI 1996 of 1996
BETWEEN:
Reuben Edward Melide Applicant
AND
Rethmann Australia Environmental Services Pty Limited ACN 002 429 781 Respondent
BEFORE: MCILWAINE JR PLACE: SYDNEY DATE: 16 JANUARY 1997 MINUTES OF ORDERS
THE COURT FINDS THAT: 1. The respondent did not have a valid reason for the termination of the employment of the Applicant on 24 July 1996. 2. The Respondent has contravened Section 170DF(1)(c) on the grounds that the Applicant was an unfinancial member of the Union prior to the termination of his Employment. 3. The Respondent has contravened Section 170DF(1)(f) on the grounds of Race. 4. The Respondent has contravened Section 170DB in that wages for two weeks should be paid. 5. It is impractical to reinstate the Applicant in his former position with the Respondent. 6. It is appropriate to award compensation to the Applicant in the sum of Three Thousand Six Hundred and Sixty Dollars and Sixteen Cents ($3660.16). The Court orders that: 1. The Respondent to pay to the Applicant within seven days of the date of these Orders the amount of Nine Hundred and Fifteen Dollars and Four Cents ($915.04). 2. Any sum paid within seven days of the date of these Orders to the Australian Taxation Office, on account of the Applicant in respect of the sum ordered in paragraph 1 shall be pro tanto satisfaction of the Respondent's obligation under Order 1. 3. The Respondent to pay to the Applicant within twenty-one days of the date of these Orders the amount of Three Thousand Six Hundred and Sixty Dollars and Sixteen Cents ($3660.16). 4. Any sum paid within twenty one days of the date of these Orders to the Australian Taxation Office, on account of the Applicant in respect of the sum ordered in paragraph 3 shall be pro tanto satisfaction of the Respondent's obligation under Order 3.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate