Federal Court of Australia
IN THE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COURT OF AUSTRALIA
TASMANIAN DISTRICT REGISTRY TI 1264 of 1995
BETWEEN: BARRY HANSCH
Applicant
AND: TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AUSTRALIA
First Respondent
KENNETH JOHN BACON
Second Respondent
SILAS FRANK MANLEY
Third Respondent
RAYMOND GEORGE AUSTIN
Fourth Respondent
JOHN MALLETT
Fifth Respondent
SAMUEL McCRAE BARKER
Sixth Respondent
RON HODGETTS
Seventh Respondent
JUDGE: RYAN J
DATE OF ORDER: 25 may 1998
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE (HEARD IN HOBART)
MINUTES OF ORDER
THE COURT ORDERS: 1. THAT IT BE DECLARED that any purported grant by the Committee of Management of the Tasmanian Branch of the first respondent of long service leave to the applicant for the whole or any part of the period from 26 September 1995 to 19 April 1996 is void and of no effect. 2. THAT liberty be reserved to any party to apply on not less than 48 hours notice in writing to the other parties. Note: Settlement and entry of orders are dealt with in Order 36 of the Industrial Relations Court Rules.
IN THE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COURT OF AUSTRALIA
TASMANIAN DISTRICT REGISTRY TI 1031 of 1996
BETWEEN: BARRY HANSCH
Applicant
AND: TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AUSTRALIA
First Respondent
KENNETH JOHN BACON
Second Respondent
SILAS FRANK MANLEY
Third Respondent
RAYMOND GEORGE AUSTIN
Fourth Respondent
JOHN MALLETT
Fifth Respondent
SAMUEL McCRAE BARKER
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate