Federal Court of Australia
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sutton v Sharp (No 3) [2000] IRCA 1
SUPPLEMENTARY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
and
SCHEDULE
SPENDER, RYAN and NORTH JJ
MELBOURNE 12 MAY 2000
IN THE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
VI 4819 OF 1995 BETWEEN: JOHN DAVID SUTTON
First Applicant
CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MINING & ENERGY UNION
Second Applicant
AND: IAN GORDON SHARP
First Respondent
THE STATE OF VICTORIA and STEPHEN GEORGE ALLEY
Second Respondents / Appellants
JOHN ATKINSON & ORS
Third Respondents
JOSEPH FERGUSON & ORS
Fourth Respondents
MICK YOUNG & ORS
Fifth Respondents
RONALD GEORGE OWENS (as representing the members of the BLF at 31 March 1994 other than those otherwise represented herein)
Sixth Respondent
and
JOHN CUMMINS, JOHN SETKA and ROBERT GREGORY WILSON (as Trustees of the BLF)
Seventh Respondents
VI 4820 OF 1995 BETWEEN: JOHN DAVID SUTTON
First Applicant
CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MINING & ENERGY UNION
Second Applicant
AND: IAN GORDON SHARP and STEPHEN GEORGE ALLEY
First Respondents / Appellants
THE STATE OF VICTORIA
Second Respondent
JOHN ATKINSON & ORS
Third Respondents
JOSEPH FERGUSON & ORS
Fourth Respondents
and
MICK YOUNG & ORS.
Fifth Respondents
RONALD GEORGE OWENS (as representing the members of the BLF at 31 March 1994 other than those otherwise represented herein)
Sixth Respondent
and
JOHN CUMMINS, JOHN SETKA and ROBERT GREGORY WILSON (as Trustees of the BLF)
Seventh Respondents
VI 4821 OF 1995 BETWEEN: JOHN ATKINSON & OTHERS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate