Federal Court of Australia
SUPREME COURT OF NORFOLK ISLAND
Cameron v Pashley [2004] NFSC 4 EMPLOYMENT – Appeal from decision of Employment Tribunal – Appeal limited to matters of law – Claim for payment in lieu of notice – Identification of contract of employment under which employees were working at date of termination – Breach of that contract in relation to termination – Computation of damages payable to employees – Whether employees were entitled to annual leave entitlements.
Employment Act 1988 (NI) ss 15, 19, 21, 91, 92 JULIAN JAMES CAMERON and SUZANNE LOUISE CAMERON v ANDREW PAUL PASHLEY, JAMES PATRICK FARRELL and NICOLA MEGAN HAYDEN SC 2 of 2004 WILCOX ACJ 9 NOVEMBER 2004 SYDNEY (BY TELEPHONE LINK TO NORFOLK ISLAND)
IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF NORFOLK ISLAND SC 2 of 2004
BETWEEN: JULIAN JAMES CAMERON
FIRST APPELLANT
SUZANNE LOUISE CAMERON
SECOND APPELLANT
AND: ANDREW PAUL PASHLEY
FIRST RESPONDENT
JAMES PATRICK FARRELL
SECOND RESPONDENT
NICOLA MEGAN HAYDEN
THIRD RESPONDENT JUDGE: WILCOX ACJ
DATE OF ORDER: 9 NOVEMBER 2004
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY (BY TELEPHONE LINK TO NORFOLK ISLAND)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal be allowed. 2. The cross-appeal be allowed. 3. The orders made by the Employment Tribunal on 15 March 2004 be set aside and, in lieu thereof, it be ordered that, within 14 days of this date, the appellants, Julian James Cameron and Suzanne Louise Cameron, pay to: (a) the first respondent, Andrew Paul Pashley, the sum of $1,316.48; (b) the second respondent, James Patrick Farrell, the sum of $791.18; and (c) the third respondent, Nicola Megan Hayden, the sum of $1,093.30.
IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF NORFOLK ISLAND SC 2 of 2004
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate