Federal Court of Australia
SUPREME COURT OF NORFOLK ISLAND
Prechelt, in the matter of Hillcrest Pty Ltd v Hillcrest Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] NFSC 3 File number: SC 3 of 2016
Judge: BESANKO CJ
Date of judgment: 31 May 2017
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – consideration of an application for an order winding up the company under s 467 of the Companies Act 1985 (Norfolk Island) – whether Court should exercise its discretion against making a winding up order – where company opposes the application for winding up – where opposition based solely on potential exposure to the costs of a liquidator – where the company has suspended its business for 12 consecutive months or more – where there is no reasonable prospect of the company carrying on business again – where there is unlikely to be any property available for distribution among the shareholders – where there is a public interest in winding up a company which is no longer trading and has no prospect of trading in the future – where allegation that directors have acted in the affairs of the company in their own interests and in a manner unfairly prejudicial to certain members – where company has an arguable cause of action against one of its officers – where delay is not a significant factor in the circumstances – where company has significant liability to one of its directors – where director has no present intention to seek repayment of the debt – where company unable to pay its debts.
Legislation: Companies Act 1985 (Norfolk Island) ss 405, 467, 468, 471, 474, 560 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 1367A Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth) reg 5.6.75 Court Procedure Rules 2006 (ACT), Schedule 6 Corporations Rules rr 1.8, 5.6 Supreme Court Act 1960 (Norfolk Island) s 19
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate