Re: Application for a review of the Determination of the Australian Competition [1998] ACompT 1

AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION TRIBUNAL

CATCHWORDS

TRADE PRACTICES – Application for review of determination by ACCC granting authorisation – whether applicant for review has a sufficient interest – meaning of "sufficient interest" in s 101(1) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), ss 88, 90, 90A, 101 Australian Conservation Foundation Inc v The Commonwealth (1980) 146 CLR 493 Onus v Alcoa of Australia Ltd (1981) 149 CLR 27 Wentworth v Woollahra Municipal Council & Others (1982) 149 CLR 672 Shop Distributive and Allied Employees Association v Minister for Industrial Affairs (SA) (1995) 183 CLR 552 Bateman's Bay Local Aboriginal Land Council & Anor v The Aboriginal Community Benefit Fund Pty Ltd & Anor [1998] HCA 49 Australian Institute of Marine and Power Engineers v Secretary, Department of Transport (1986) 13 FCR 124 Broadbridge and Anor v Stammers (1987) 16 FCR 296 Ogle & Anor v Strickland and Others (1987) 13 FCR 306 Queensland Newsagents Federation Ltd v Trade Practices Commission; Ex parte Newsagency Council of Victoria Ltd and Others (1993) 15 ATPR 41-276 Sevenoaks Urban District Council v Twynam [1929] 2 KB 440 Application by Wylie Steel Pty Ltd for review of grant of authorization to Broken Hill Proprietary Company Ltd (1980) 3 ATPR 40-170 Broken Hill Pty Co Ltd v Trade Practices Tribunal and Others (1980) 3 ATPR 40-173 RE: application for a review of the determination of the australian competition and consumer commission made on 22 july 1998 granting authorisation in relation to application nos. a90649 and a90655 (alliance agreement between ansett australia, ansett internatIONAL, AIR NEW ZEALAND AND SINGAPORE AIRLINES)

by: peter keith wakeman

Applicant

no.7 of 1998

justice von DOUSSA (acting president), mr r c davey &