Federal Court of Australia
AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION TRIBUNAL
Application by ETSA Utilities [2010] ACompT 5 Citation: Application by ETSA Utilities [2010] ACompT 5
Review from: Australian Energy Regulator
Parties: ETSA UTILITIES (ABN 13 332 330 749)
File number: 4 of 2010
Judges: MIDDLETON J (DEPUTY PRESIDENT), MR R DAVEY AND MR R SHOGREN
Date of delivery of reasons: 13 October 2010
Date of hearing: 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 20 and 21 September 2010
Place: Melbourne
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 33
Counsel for ETSA Utilities: Ms M Sloss SC with Mr CA Moore and Mr M Borsky
Solicitor for ETSA Utilities: Gilbert + Tobin Lawyers
Counsel for Australian Energy Regulator: Mr P Hanks QC with Mr Gray, Ms R Ellyard, Mr T Clarke and Mr L Merrick
Solicitor for Australian Energy Regulator: Corrs Chambers Westgarth
IN THE AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION TRIBUNAL
FILE NO. 4 of 2010
RE: APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 71B OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICITY LAW FOR REVIEW OF A DISTRIBUTION DETERMINATION MADE BY THE AUSTRALIAN ENERGY REGULATOR IN RELATION TO ETSA UTLITITES PURSUANT TO CLAUSE 6.11.1 OF CHAPTER 6 OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICITY RULES
BY: ETSA UTLITITES (ABN 13 332 330 749)
Applicant
MEMBERS: MIDDLETON J (DEPUTY PRESIDENT),
MR R DAVEY AND MR R SHOGREN DATE OF PUBLICATION OF REASONS FOR DECISION: 13 October 2010
PLACE: MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate