Federal Court of Australia
Australian Competition Tribunal
Application by New South Wales Minerals Council (No 4) [2021] ACompT 5 Review of: Decision of the Commonwealth Treasurer under s 44H of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) not to declare services at the Port of Newcastle made on 16 February 2021
File number: ACT 1 of 2021
Tribunal: JUSTICE O'BRYAN (Deputy President) DR D ABRAHAM (Member) PROF K DAVIS (Member)
Date of determination: 18 November 2021
Catchwords: COSTS – whether Tribunal is empowered by s 44KB to award costs in a review under s 44K(2) of a decision under s 44H not to declare a service – principles to be applied in considering the making of a costs order – whether application for review was unmeritorious – costs not awarded STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – meaning of s 44KB(1) – meaning of the phrase "proceedings for a review of a declaration under section 44K" – meaning of the phrase "a person who has been made a party to proceedings" – circumstances in which Court justified in construing a provision as if it contained additional words
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) ss 44K, 44KB Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 15AA
Cases cited: ABN AMRO Bank NV v Bathurst Regional Council (2014) 224 FCR 1 Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue (2009) 239 CLR 27 Application by Glencore Coal Pty Ltd [2016] ACompT 6 Application by New South Wales Mineral Council [2021] ACompT 2 Application by New South Wales Minerals Council (No 2) [2021] ACompT 3 Application by New South Wales Minerals Council (No 3) [2021] ACompT 4 Application by New South Wales Minerals Council [2021] ACompT 2 Berenguel v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] HCA 8; 264 ALR 417 Carr v Finance Corporation of Australia Ltd (No 2) (1982) 150 CLR 139 CIC Insurance Ltd v Bankstown Football Club Ltd (1997) 187 CLR 384 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Hadgkiss (2007) 169 FCR 151 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Consolidated Media Holdings Ltd (2012) 250 CLR 503 Financial Services Council Ltd v Industry Super Australia Pty Ltd (2014) 222 FCR 455 Kelly v The Queen (2004) 218 CLR 216 Knightsbridge Estates Trust Ltd v Byrne [1940] AC 613 Pilbara Infrastructure v Australian Competition Tribunal (2012) 246 CLR 379 Port of Newcastle Operations Pty Ltd v Australian Competition Tribunal (2017) 253 FCR 115 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 Quikfund (Australia) Pty Ltd v Airmark Consolidators Pty Ltd (2014) 222 FCR 13 R v A2 [2019] HCA 35; 373 ALR 214 Re Duke Eastern Gas Pipeline Pty Ltd [2001] ACompT 3; ATPR 41-827 Re Glencore Coal Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] ACompT 7; 309 FLR 358 Riley v Commonwealth (1985) 159 CLR 1 Sydney Airport Corporation v Australian Competition Tribunal (2006) 155 FCR 124 SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 262 CLR 362 Taylor v The Owners – Strata Plan No 11564 (2014) 253 CLR 531
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate