Federal Court of Australia
COPYRIGHT TRIBUNAL OF AUSTRALIA
Audio-Visual Copyright Society Limited v Foxtel Management Pty Limited [2012] ACopyT 1 Citation: Audio-Visual Copyright Society Limited v Foxtel Management Pty Limited [2012] ACopyT 1
Parties: AUDIO-VISUAL COPYRIGHT SOCIETY LIMITED v FOXTEL MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED
File number(s): CT 1 of 2010
Tribunal: JAGOT J (PRESIDENT) DR HUGH SIBLY (MEMBER)
Date of judgment: 1 June 2012
Catchwords: COPYRIGHT - equitable remuneration for retransmission of free-to-air (FTA) channels by respondent – where Tribunal previously determined equitable remuneration payable by respondent for retransmission of five FTA channels and two multichannels – application by collecting society for determination of amount of equitable remuneration for nine new multichannels – determination of amount to be paid
Legislation: Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (Cth) Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) Copyright Amendment Act 2006 (Cth) (Act No 158 of 2006)
Cases cited: Audio-Visual Copyright Society Ltd v Foxtel Management Pty Ltd (No 4) (2006) 68 IPR 367; [2006] ACopyT 2
Date of hearing: 30 January, 1-3, 6-7, 9-10 February, 21 May 2012
Place: Sydney
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 194
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr D Catterns with Mr C Dimitriadis and Ms L Thomas
Solicitor for the Applicant: Banki Haddock Fiora
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr R Cobden SC with Ms J Beaumont
Solicitor for the Respondent: Minter Ellison
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Act 1968
IN THE COPYRIGHT TRIBUNAL CT 1 of 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate