Federal Court of Australia
COPYRIGHT TRIBUNAL OF AUSTRALIA
Audio-Visual Copyright Society Limited v Foxtel Management Pty Limited (No 2) [2012] ACopyT 2 Citation: Audio-Visual Copyright Society Limited v Foxtel Management Pty Limited (No 2) [2012] ACopyT 2
Parties: AUDIO-VISUAL COPYRIGHT SOCIETY LIMITED v FOXTEL MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED
File number: CT 1 of 2010
Tribunal: JAGOT J (DEPUTY PRESIDENT)
Date of judgment: 23 August 2012
Catchwords: COPYRIGHT – determination of equitable remuneration payable by respondent for retransmission of less than nine multichannels – where equitable remuneration for retransmission of all nine multichannels previously determined
Cases cited: Audio-Visual Copyright Society Limited v Foxtel Management Pty Limited [2012] ACopyT 1
Date of hearing: 23 August 2012
Place: Sydney
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 8
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr D Catterns QC and Mr C Dimitriadis
Solicitor for the Applicant: Banki Haddock Fiora
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr R Cobden SC and Ms J Beaumont
Solicitor for the Respondent: Minter Ellison
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Act 1968
IN THE COPYRIGHT TRIBUNAL CT 1 of 2010
BETWEEN: AUDIO-VISUAL COPYRIGHT SOCIETY LIMITED
Applicant
AND: FOXTEL MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED
Respondent
TRIBUNAL: JAGOT j (deputy president) DATE OF ORDER: 23 AUGUST 2012 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The parties are to file an agreed form of orders reflecting the Tribunal's position by close of business Monday 27 August 2012.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Act 1968
IN THE COPYRIGHT TRIBUNAL CT 1 of 2010
BETWEEN: AUDIO-VISUAL COPYRIGHT SOCIETY LIMITED
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate