Federal Court of Australia
COPYRIGHT TRIBUNAL OF AUSTRALIA
Copyright Agency Limited v University of Adelaide (Interim Orders) [2019] ACopyT 2 File number: CT 4 of 2018
Tribunal: PERRAM J (DEPUTY PRESIDENT)
Date of Determination: 8 May 2019
Catchwords: COPYRIGHT – equitable remuneration for statutory licence for copying and communicating works by educational institutions – application for interim orders under s 160 of Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) for interim payments – where previous agreement has expired – consideration of relative prejudice and hardships between parties
Legislation: Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) ss 113R, 160
Cases cited: Application by Isentia Pty Limited [2018] ACopyT 4 Application by Streem Pty Limited [2018] ACopyT 1 Audio-Visual Copyright Society Ltd v New South Wales Department of School Education [1997] ACopyT 1 Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation [1988] HCA 17; 164 CLR 662 Commonwealth v McCormack [1984] HCA 57; 155 CLR 273 Cox v Hakes (1890) 15 App Cas 506 Phonographic Performance Company of Australia Limited under section 154(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) [2016] ACopyT 3 Rodger v The Comptoir D'Escompte de Paris (1871) LR 3 PC 465
Date of hearing: 16 April 2019
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 26
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr N R Murray SC and Ms E Bathurst
Solicitor for the Applicant: Banki Haddock Fiora
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr R Cobden SC and Ms L Thomas
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate