Federal Court of Australia
COPYRIGHT TRIBUNAL of Australia
Reference by APRA AMCOS (Summonses) [2022] ACopyT 4 File number: CT 1 of 2021
The Tribunal: PERRAM J (DEPUTY PRESIDENT)
Date of decision: 11 July 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to issue summons – where summonses objected to
Legislation: Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) ss 154, 164, 167(3), 172(2)
Cases cited: Gloucester Shire Council v Fitch Ratings, Inc [2016] FCA 587 Reference by Phonographic Performance Company of Australia Ltd [2009] ACopyT 1; 84 IPR 393 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Re John Dee (Export) Pty Ltd (1990) ATPR 41-006 Sabre Corporation Pty Ltd v Russ Kalvin's Hair Co (1993) 46 FCR 428
Number of paragraphs: 80
Date of last submissions: 26 April 2022
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr M Hall SC with Ms R De Stoop and Ms M Evetts
Solicitor for the Applicants: Banki Haddock Fiora
Counsel for Stan Entertainment Pty Ltd: Ms A Campbell
Solicitor Stan Entertainment Pty Ltd: MinterEllison
Counsel for Apple Pty Ltd: Ms F St John
Solicitor for Apple Pty Ltd: Clayton Utz
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate