Federal Court of Australia
Copyright Tribunal of Australia
Isentia Pty Limited v Copyright Agency Limited (Release of Implied Undertaking) [2022] ACopyT 5 File numbers: CT 2 of 2017 CT 2 of 2018 CT 1 of 2018
The Tribunal: PERRAM J (ACTING PRESIDENT)
Date of decision: 8 September 2022
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where application for release of implied undertaking – whether confidentiality regime applies to four documents – where documents not in evidence in present application – where documents part of affidavit evidence in prior hearing – where document not read in prior hearing
Legislation: Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) s 31(1)(a) Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) s 14
Cases cited: Application by Isentia Pty Limited [2021] ACopyT 2 Ashby v Slipper (No 2) [2016] FCA 550; 343 ALR 351 Halcon International Inc v Shell Transport and Trading Co [1979] RPC 97 Hearne v Street [2008] HCA 36; 235 CLR 125 Mann v Medical Defence Union Limited [1997] FCA 45 Otter Gold Mines Ltd v McDonald (1997) 76 FCR 467 Paino v Hofbauer (1988) 13 NSWLR 193 Perdaman Chemicals & Fertilisers Pty Ltd v Griffin Coal Mining Company Pty Ltd [No 2] [2011] WASC 189 Royal ExpressPty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed)(Administrator Appointed) v Huang (No.5) [2021] FCA 1302 Springfield Nominees Pty Ltd v Bridgelands Securities Ltd (1992) 38 FCR 217 Treasury Wine Estates Ltd v Maurice Blackburn Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 226; 282 FCR 95
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate