Federal Court of Australia
IN THE DEFENCE FORCE
No. DFDAT 5 of 1989 DISCIPLINE APPEAL TRIBUNAL )
IN THE MATTER of the Defence Force Discipline Appeals Act 1955
AND IN THE MATTER of an Appeal against conviction
by a Defence Force Magistrate of Petty Officer Fire Control Linsey Peter Anning R113024
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Members: The Hon. Mr Justice Woodward (President) The Hon. Mr Justice Cox (Deputy President) The Hon. Mr Justice Gallop (Member)
Date: 11 May 1990
Melbourne
-2-
This is an appeal pursuant to s.20(1) of the
Defence Force Discipline Appeal Act 1955 against convictions
by Defence Force Magistrate on 19 July 1989 at HMAS CERBERUS
in Victoria.
The appellant was convicted of two offences against s.33, and two offences against s.60, of the Defence Force
Discipline Act 1982. In respect of each offence, the
appellant was fined the sum of $250 and made subject to forfeiture of all seniority as a Petty Officer to the date of
his conviction. Section 33 reads:
"A person, being a defence member or a defence civilian, who, on service land, in a service ship, service aircraft or service vehicle or in a public place:
(a) assaults another person;
(b) creates a disturbance or takes part in creating or continuing a disturbance;
(c) behaves in an obscene manner within the view or another person; or
(d) uses insulting or provocative words to another person;
is guilty of an offence for which the maximum punishment is imprisonment for 6 months."
Section 60 reads:
"KR defence member who, by act or omission, behaves in a manner likely to prejudice the discipline of, or bring discredit upon, the Defence Force is guilty of an offence for which the maximum punishment is imprisonment for 3 months."
-3-
The relevant parts of the Charge Sheet read as
follows:
"First Charge
Defence Force Discipline Act section 33(d)
Second Charge
Defence Force Discipline Act section 33(d)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate