Federal Court of Australia
DEFENCE FORCE DISCIPLINE APPEAL TRIBUNAL
Jesser v Chief of Air Force [2015] ADFDAT 3 Citation: Jesser v Chief of Air Force [2015] ADFDAT 3
Appeal from: Defence Force Magistrate
Parties: MEGAN LOUISE JESSER v CHIEF OF AIR FORCE
File number: DFDAT 2 of 2015
Judges: TRACEY J (PRESIDENT), LOGAN j (deputy president) AND BRERETON J (MEMBER)
Date of judgment: 25 August 2015
Catchwords: DEFENCE – conviction relating to threat to inflict grievous bodily harm under s 31 of the Crimes Act 1900 (ACT) (the Act) – whether open to conclude beyond reasonable doubt that appellant guilty of charge on which she was convicted – where threat spoken by appellant to her treating doctor during medical consultation and in respect of appellant's superior officer – consideration of proper construction of s 31(b)(ii) of the Act – meaning of "fear" – whether reasonable person in the circumstances would fear threat would be carried out
Legislation: Defence Force Discipline Act 1982 (Cth) s 61 Defence Force Discipline Appeals Act 1955 (Cth) s 23 Crimes Act 1900 (ACT) ss 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 28, 31 33, 35, 35A, 37, 41 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Code Act (NT) s 166
Cases cited: Barbaro v Quilty [1999] ACTSC 119 applied Bropho v Western Australia (1991) 171 CLR 1 cited Bunting v Gokel [2001] NTSC 24 applied Kingston v Keprose Pty Limited (1987) 11 NSWLR 404 cited M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 cited McEwan v Rohan [2012] ACTSC 181 not followed MFA v The Queen (2002) 213 CLR 606 cited Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 cited R v Moore-McQuillan [2014] SASCFC 113 cited SKA v R (2011) 243 CLR 400 cited Waugh Hotel Management Pty Ltd v Marrickville Council (2009) 171 LGERA 112 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate