Federal Court of Australia
IN THE
[Agu] AFPDT 6
FEDERAL POLICE )
No. 7 of 1984
DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL )
MR B.R.
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
against
CONSTABLE MARK ANDREW STRAHLE
FINDINGS
MAGUIRE Q.C., MEMBER
\G vEcEMBER 1984
CANBERRA, A.C.T.
THE TRIBUNAL FINDS THAT:-—
lhe Constable Mark Andrew Strahle is not guilty of the breach of
discipline alleged in Charge No. AFP:36/8384, namely:-
That he, being a member of the Australian Federal Police, was guilty of a disciplinary offence specified in paragraph 18(109a) of the Australian Federal Police (Discipline) Regulations by contravening a provision of Division 1 of those Regulations, namely paragraph 7, in that on 7 December 1983 at Canberra in the Australian Capital Territory, during a record of conversation conducted by Acting Senior Sergeant Alan Robert PATERSON, a member of the Australian Federal Police, he having been asked by the said Alan Robert PATERSON the question: "Would you tell me what took place at "HILLIERS' with regard to the ammunition from your service revolver?" - answered: "i had six rounds of ammunition
in the left hand front pocket of my jeans which I removed
and gave to Dennis CONDON..." thereby knowingly making in
. the course of his duty an oral statement that was false.
2 Constable Mark Andrew Strahle is not guilty of the breach of
discipline alleged in Charge No. AFP:8384, namely:-
That he, being a member of the Australian Federal Police, was guilty of a disciplinary offence specified in paragraph 18(1)(a) of the Australian Federal Police (Discipline) Regulations by contravening a provision of Division 1 of those Regulations, namely sub-paragraph 5(a), in that on
or about 2 June 1983 at St. Kilda in the State of Victoria he disobeyed a lawful written instruction, to wit, the provisions of sub-section 13(2) of Administrative Circular No. 170, issued by the Commissioner of Police on 17 February 1983 and in force at that time, in that he failed to ensure that his issued service firearm was kept in a secure place
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate