Federal Court of Australia
(30)
* "DGMEN {i wy JOGMENT No. ons ce aare: Ann. IN THE FEDERAL POLICE ) ) No. 9 of 1986 DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL ) COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Against SENIOR CONSTABLE PETER FRANCIS ROBERTS IN THE MATTER of the Complaints (Australian Federal Police) Act 1981. Nee' DECISTON TRIBUNAL: Mr. Justice Jenkinson, Deputy President DATE: 10 April, 1987 1. The Tribunal finds that Senior Constable Peter Francis Roberts is guilty of the breach of discipline alleged in Ww the notification AFP3/8687 dated 29 September, 1986.
2. The Tribunal imposes in respect of the said breach of discipline the penalty that the annual rate of salary of Senior Constable Peter Francis Roberts be reduced to the lowest annual rate of salary payable to members of the Australian Federal Police holding the grade of Senior Constable within the rank of Constable.
uty President
IN THE FEDERAL POLICE ) )
No. 3 of 1986
DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL
10 April,
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
Against
SENIOR CONSTABLE FRANCIS ROBERTS
IN THE MATTER of Complaints Austr Federal Police) Act
1987 MR. JUSTICE _JENK
PETER
the alian 1981.
INSON
Deputy President
REASONS FOR DECISION
The Disciplinary Tribunal has for decision p
against Senior Constable Peter Francis Roberts in res
roceedings
pect of a
breach of discipline constituted by his improper conduct in his
official capacity.
The disciplinary offence charged was:
"That on or about the 15th day of July 1985, at Melbourne in the State of Victoria, you the
said Peter Francis ROBERTS, a member of the Australian Federal Police, were guilty of improper conduct in your official capacity in that you did intimidate and deny access. to legal representation to Adam Musaka JAFFERS, a person in the custody of the Australian
Federal Police."
The proceedings were instituted in pursuance of
Regulation
19A(1)(a) of the Australian Federal Police (Discipline)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate