Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL POLICE DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL
FPDT 1 of 1995 BETWEEN
CONSTABLE ROBERT LEES
Appellant ~and-
ISSIONER OF POLICE
Respondent
Before the Deputy President Justice Olney Place: Canberra
Date: 5 December 1995
REASONS FOR DECISION
This is an appeal to s 69(1) of the Complaints (Australian
Federal Police) Act 1981 (the Complaints Act).
On 3 January 1995 the Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police (the Commissioner) imposed a penalty on the appellant, a constable in the Australian Federal Police (the AFP), in respect of a breach of discipline otherwise than in pursuance to s 67(6) of the Complaints Act. The penalty imposed was that the appellant be dismissed from the AFP. The appellant originally appealed on a number of grounds but the only ground
pressed at the hearing was that referred to in s 69(3)(b)
namely, that the penalty is unduly severe.
The appeal was heard on 4 December. The matter was dealt with as a hearing de novo. The bulk of the evidence for the Commissioner was comprised in an agreed bundle of documents which, by consent, was tendered in evidence without formal
proof. The Commissioner's statement of reasons given
FeV GS
SCO
Ss
-~-2- pursuant to s 69(1) of the Complaints Act was also tendered without objection. The appellant gave oral evidence, as did a number of witnesses called on his behalf. Each witness was subjected to cross-examination by counsel appearing for the
Commissioner.
The disciplinary offence of which the appellant was found guilty by the Commissioner is the offence referred to in regulation 18(1)(h) of the Australian Federal Police Discipline Regulations (the regulations) namely, that the appellant had been charged before a court with an offence against a law of a State, which charge had been proved to the
satisfaction of the court.
The short facts in relation to the disciplinary offence are these: On 18 July 1994, the appellant pleaded guilty in the Local Court at Batemans Bay to a charge of assault occasioning actual bodily harm, an offence created by s 59 of the Crimes Act (NSW). The facts presented to the Local Court by the prosecutor indicated that on the morning of Sunday 27 February 1994 as patrons of Beachie's Nightclub at Batehaven were leaving the premises, the victim of the assault, one Murray William Sheppard saw that two of his friends had become involved in an altercation. He attempted to separate those concerned but was pushed against a wall. Whilst he was pinned against the wall the appellant punched him on the left side of the face, on the nose, to the right side of the face
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate