Federal Register of Legislation
Evidence Amendment (Journalists' Privilege) Act 2011
No. 21, 2011
An Act to amend the Evidence Act 1995, and for related purposes
Contents 1 Short title 2 Commencement 3 Schedule(s) Schedule 1—Amendments relating to journalists' privilege Evidence Act 1995 Family Law Act 1975
Evidence Amendment (Journalists' Privilege) Act 2011 No. 21, 2011
An Act to amend the Evidence Act 1995, and for related purposes
[Assented to 12 April 2011]
The Parliament of Australia enacts:
1 Short title This Act may be cited as the Evidence Amendment (Journalists' Privilege) Act 2011.
2 Commencement This Act commences on the day after it receives the Royal Assent.
3 Schedule(s) Each Act that is specified in a Schedule to this Act is amended or repealed as set out in the applicable items in the Schedule concerned, and any other item in a Schedule to this Act has effect according to its terms.
Schedule 1—Amendments relating to journalists' privilege
Evidence Act 1995
1 Division 1A of Part 3.10 Repeal the Division, substitute:
Division 1A—Journalists' privilege
126G Definitions (1) In this Division: informant means a person who gives information to a journalist in the normal course of the journalist's work in the expectation that the information may be published in a news medium. journalist means a person who is engaged and active in the publication of news and who may be given information by an informant in the expectation that the information may be published in a news medium. news medium means any medium for the dissemination to the public or a section of the public of news and observations on news.
126H Protection of journalists' sources (1) If a journalist has promised an informant not to disclose the informant's identity, neither the journalist nor his or her employer is compellable to answer any question or produce any document that would disclose the identity of the informant or enable that identity to be ascertained. (2) The court may, on the application of a party, order that subsection (1) is not to apply if it is satisfied that, having regard to the issues to be determined in that proceeding, the public interest in the disclosure of evidence of the identity of the informant outweighs: (a) any likely adverse effect of the disclosure on the informant or any other person; and (b) the public interest in the communication of facts and opinion to the public by the news media and, accordingly also, in the ability of the news media to access sources of facts. (3) An order under subsection (2) may be made subject to such terms and conditions (if any) as the court thinks fit.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate