Federal Register of Legislation
AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE For the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose signature appears below issues the following Airworthiness Directive (AD) under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998. The AD requires that the action set out in the requirement section (being action that the delegate considers necessary to correct the unsafe condition) be taken in relation to the aircraft or aeronautical product mentioned in the applicability section: (a) in the circumstances mentioned in the requirement section; and (b) in accordance with the instructions set out in the requirement section; and (c) at the time mentioned in the compliance section.
Allison Turbine Engines - 250 Series AD/AL 250/84 HMU PLA Potentiometer 2/2005
Applicability: Rolls-Royce Corporation (formerly Allison Engine Company, Allison Gas Turbine Division, and Detroit Diesel Allison) (RRC) models 250-C30R/3, -C30R/3M, -C47B, and -C47M turboshaft engines that have a hydromechanical unit (HMU) with a part number (P/N) listed in paragraph 1.A. Group A of RRC Alert Commercial Engine Bulletins (ACEB) CEB A-73-3103, Revision 4, dated 2 December 2003 and CEB A-73-6030, Revision 4, dated 2 December 2003. Note 1: These engines are known to be installed on, but not limited to, Bell OH-58D, Bell Helicopter Textron 407, Boeing AH/MH-6M and MD Helicopters Inc. 600N helicopters. Requirement: 1. Perform an electrical signal inspection of the HMU Power Lever Angle (PLA) potentiometer in accordance with paragraphs 2.B. through 2.B.(8) and 2.B.(10) of the Accomplishment Instructions of ACEB CEB A-73-3103, Revision 4, or CEB A- 73-6030, Revision 4. 2. If the electrical signal result is found to be unacceptable during the Requirement 1 inspection replace the HMU. 3. Replace the HMU with a redesigned HMU (ie one with a dual element potentiometer) that has a P/N that is not listed in paragraph 1.A. Group A of ACEB CEB A-73-3103, Revision 4 and CEB A-73-6030, Revision 4. Replacing the HMU with an HMU that has a P/N not specified in the referenced ACEBs terminates the Requirement 1 repetitive inspection. Note 2: FAA AD 2004-24-04 Amdt 39-13880 refers. Compliance: For Requirements 1 - Within 300 time in service (TIS) after the effective date of this Directive or within 300 hours TIS after completing the inspection in accordance with Requirement 1 of AD/AL 502, which ever occurs earlier, and thereafter at intervals of 300 hours TIS until Requirement 3 is accomplished. For Requirement 2 - Before further flight immediately following the Requirement 1 inspection. For Requirement 3 - Within 600 hours TIS after the effective date of this Directive, or by 17 March 2005, whichever occurs earlier.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate