High Court of Australia
IN THE VIGH COURT CF AUS
AUSTRALIA RECISTRY
Ho. 12 of 1933.
(Befendants) Appellants
~ ond -
ED BUSBY (Plaintiff) as Reso ondent
THE HONOURABLE SIR GEO. ER. JUSTICE STAR EVATT and Uy. JUS'
EDWARD RICH K.C.M.S "RR. JUSTICE DTLON,
TSTICE
THURSDAY THE 21st DAY OF SEPTSMBER. 1933 AL agaiust the Judgment of the Suoreme Court of South Australia made and pronounced herein by the Honourable Mr. Justice Angas Parsons on the lst day of August 1933
COMING ON
Inge in Melbourne this 2lst day of September
1933 in the presence of Mr. Lewis and Mr. Hudson of Counsel for the Appvellants and Mr. Ligertwood I.c. and lr. Geoffrey
Harvy of Counsel for the Resnondent THIS Cou!
that the said appeal be dismissed a that the Appellants do pay to the Respondent his costs of
this appeal to he taxed.
CLARK AND ANOTHER V. BUSBY. duggment. Rich J.
: I interpret the learned judge's judgment read ea a whole as not finding contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff. The facts shew and the learned judge so decided that during the whole of the
ecourence defendant's conduct began ,contimued and ended in negligence ¢.
The appeal sould be dismissed,
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate