High Court of Australia
ORIGINAL "
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA.
LLIAM BAR'
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT.
Delivered at__ Sydney _
on_12
40358 A: H. Perriven, Active Govr. Privt.
oy qi
JUDGMENT
THE KING AND THE COMMISSTIONSR OF
TAXATION
LR. JUSTICN REICH
THE KING AND THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
ve. WILLIAM BARBER THOMPSON.
Judgment. Rich J. This is a motion for judgment for the plaintiffs in terms of the
relief specifically stated in the statement of claim. No defence was filed by the defendant within the time prescribed by the Rules of Court but the defendant applied for and obtained an extension of time for filing a defence until the 29th June on the understanding that the hearing of the matter was not to be delayed by reason of the extension. The defendant, however,has not filed any defence. In an ordinary proceeding by statement ¢ of claim where the defendant has made default in delivering a defence the fm facts stated in the statement of claim are taken to be admitted by the defendant,Order 26 r.7, Young v. Thomas,1892 2 Ch.at p.137. The proceed- ing in this case is a taxation prosecution wmder Part V1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936-1942,but I do not propose to take into consideration
, the averments as set out in the statement of claim as they inctude matters relating to other income tax years. The admitted facts are that during the year ended 30th June 1942 the defendant carried on the profession of a medical practivioner at Sydney and that for the period from the lst July 1941 to the 30th June 1942 he made a return of his income for this period which he declared to be true and correct in every particuler and disclosed
without any reservation or exception a true and complete statement of all
income derived by him during that period. The gross income returned for F his profession was stated by the defendant to be £1,620. Thus he knowing~ ly and wilfully understated his gross income as it appears from the books } of account kept by him in his own handwriting and admitted by him to be
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate