High Court of Australia
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
"Oral Judgment delivered at........-.... Sey.
Wednesday 15th April 1970
'on. een ne anita _
PRESTON COAL COMPANY LIMITED
ve
HAROLD
ORDER
Appeal is allowed with costs. The order of the Supreme Court of the State of New South Wales set aside and in lieu thereof order that the appeal from that Court to the Court of Appeal
of the State of New South Wales be allowed with costs, verdict
for plaintiff be set aside and judgment entered for the defendant.
[0
PRESTON COAL COMPANY LIMITED ve
EAROLD
JUDGMENT BARWICK C.J. (ORAL)
PRESTON COAL COMPANY LIMTTED
Ve
HAROLD In my opinion there was in this case no evidence
of negligence on the part of the appellant. The respondent was directed to work according to the directions of a man named Riley. This must have meant that the manner of doing the work was to be in accordance with Riley's instructions for the job itself had been nominated by Thomas.
It is quite clear that Thomas had, in substance, told the respondent to wait for Riley before doing the "work in connection with the centrepiece; but as the respondent was on his way to doing another job, pending the arrival of Riley, he met Riley who said to the respondent and his fellow workmen, "I will take these coils to the charger and yous can go around".
The only suggested grounds of negligence which now remain open to the respondent are first, that the appellant failed to give him adequate instructions as to the manner of doing a job which, apparently simple, could prove dangerous; and secondly, that Riley ought to have given a specific warning not to start work till he arrived because of what is claimed
to have been an inherent danger in the performance of the work.
In my opinion the words used by Riley to the respondent were incapable of bearing the meaning that the -respondent was to start the work in Riley's absence and, perhaps more significantly, that where instructions as to the manner of doing the work might prove necessary, the respondent should go ahead without any instructions.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate