High Court of Australia
te
HEARD:
6th August 1964, ORAL JUDGMENT
AIRLINES OF NEW SOUTH WALES PTY. LIMITED Ve
THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES AND OTHERS
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION |
I do not think any differentiation is Justified between the costs of the application for the ingunetion ant the costes of the other interlocutory
proceodings. The order 1 make ie that the aetion be
dignieved with eoste including costs of all interloeutory proesedings, the judgment being prefaced by a recital that the plaintiff and the first two defendants agree that the action relates te the lav of the Gowsenvealth ant of the State of New douth Wales as at the date of institution af the aetions.
< eortifty for counsel in respect of ali the interlocutery applications,
As no part of the order, I note that f shall intimate for the assistance of the taxing officer that appearance of senior counsel in the matters they attended appoarg to me to have been Justified.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate