High Court of Australia
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
rd
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Oral
Judgment delivered at. ¥ 2229 .---21--eceeee-eneeeeeeeneeeeee Thursday 2nd September 1971
(29
ROBERT ALLAN BOURKE
THE QUEEN
B co Es]
Special leave refused.
TUDGNENT
(QRAL)
ROBERT ALLAN BOURKE
BARWICK C.J.
ROBERT ALLAN BOURKE
ve
In my opinion this is not a case for special leave.
Apart from a very substantial lapse of time since the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeal, the matter in the judgment of that Court of which the applicant complains is, in my opinion, upon its proper analysis, particular to the facts and circumstances of this case and is not a matter calling for this Court's further consideration of that aspect of the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeal.
In rejecting the application, however, I would not wish to be taken to agree with all that the Court of Criminal' Appeal has said in point of general principle as to the ingredients of the crime of rape; but this is not in my opinion a case in \ which the propriety of those views should be examined.
I would refuse special leave to appeal.
eg
IUDGNENT (ORAL)
ROBERT ALLAN BOURKE
ve
McTIERNAN J.
"ft
leave.
OBERT ALLAN BO'
"THE QUEEN
I agree that this is not a case for special
JUDGMENT MENZIES J. CORAL)
BOURKE ve
THE QUEEN
I agree.
ay
ROBERT ALLAN BOURKE
Ve
JUDGMENT : WINDEYER J. (ORAL)
~
ROBERT ALLAN BOURKE ve
THE QUEEN
I agree.
*
JUDGMENT
(ORAL)
{ ROBERT ALLAN BOURKE
Ve
THE QUEEN
OWEN J.
ROBERT ALLAN BOURKE Ve
THE QUEEN
I agree.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate