MEE LING V. COMMERCIAL BANKING COMPANY OF SYDNEY LIMITED

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA .

MEE LING

COMMERCIAL BANKING COMPANY OF Terror SYDNEY LIMITED

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Oral Judgment delivered at...

on..

MEE LING

Ve

COMMERCIAL BANKING COMPANY OF SYDNEY LIMITED

Appeal dismissed with costs.

(HE

MEE LING

COMMERCIAL BANKING COMPANY OF SYDNEY LIMITED

JUDGMENT BARWICK C.J. (ORAL)

MEE _LING

Ve

COMMERCIAL BANKING COMPANY OF SYDNEY LIMITED

In this appeal Mr. Rich has said all he could have said in support of the appeal: but having considered all he has said it seems to me the appeal must be dismissed.

Reading the transcript, which is with the appeal book, it seems to me quite plain, that his Honour was entitled in the circumstances to draw the' conclusion that there was no objection to his hearing the proceedings, Indeed, I think on; reading the transcript the proper conclusion is that the parties agreed to his hearing the proceedings, In those circumstances the law is quite clear that the appellant can make no objection at this point. of time to the fact that his Honour did hear the proceedings, I say that without regard to the undoubted fact that the appellant had no answer to the petition for sequestration of his estate and that he in fact had a serious deficiency shown on the

affidavits before his Honour,

In my opinion the appeal should be dismissed.

COMMERCIAL BANKING COMPANY OF SYDNEY LIMITED

ayrang McPIZRNAN J. 'ab

LIMITED

I am of the same opinion,

MEE LING Vo

COMMERCIAL BANKING COMPANY OF SYDNEY LIMITED

JUDGMENT OWEN J. (ORAL)

MEE LING Vo

COMMERCIAL BANKING COMPANY OF SYDNEY LIMITED

I agree.