High Court of Australia
ORIGINAL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
_—WITHERDEN
Ve
ARDGOUR PTY. LIMITED
COW PLAIN PTY. LinTTép, EWENMAR PTY. LIMITED,
DEVLINS PIY. LIMITED
AND FREDERICK HODY ESPATES PTY.
LIMITED
-TRADING. 2S ESTATE LATE. Fe Be BODY, BUNDEMAR.
ORIGINAL
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Oral Judgment delivered at_..SZDNEY on_Monday.,..20th. April_1964.
'A. C. Books, Government Printer, Malbourne .7639/60
ERIC LAWRENCE WITHERDEN
Ve
ARDGOUR PLY, LIMITED, COW PLAIN PTY, LIMITED, ENMAR PIY. LIMITED, DEVLINS PTY. LIMITED, AND FREDERICK BODY ESTATES PTY, LIMITED
TRADING AS ESTAT# LATE F. EB. BODY, BUNDEMAR.
JUDGMENT JUDGMENT OF THE COURT eliv: by McTITERNAN J
CORAM: McTIERNAN J. KITTO J. TAYLOR J. MENZIES J. OWEN Je
ERIC LAWRENCE WITHERDEN
Ve ARDGOUR PTY, LIMITED, COW PLAIN PTY, LIMITED,
EWENMAR PTY, LIMITED, DEVLINS PTY, LIMITED AND DERICK BODY #STATES PTY. LIMITED
TRADING AS ESTATE LATE F. BE. BODY, BUNDEMAR
We are of the opinion that the decision of the majority of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of New South Wales is right and, therefore, the appeal will be dismissed with costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate