High Court of Australia
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
MINTS PRY. LIMTL
ORAL
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Sydne
Judgment delivered at.
lay 6
on...
'A.C. Brooks, Government Printer, Melbourne c.5072/6
CREST INVESTMENTS PTY.
Ve
STOSSEL
Appeal dismissed with costs.
CREST INVESTMENTS PTY. LIMITED
Ve
STOSSEL
MEN BARWICK C.J.
CREST INVESTMENTS PTY. LIMITED
Ve
STOSSE
In this matter the appellant appeals against a judgment given by his Honour, Mr. Justice Macfarlan, in the Commercial Causes court of New South Wales by which his Honour found that an agreement by the defendant to pay certain fees to the plaintiff had been made out to his satisfaction.
The sole ground on which the appellant seeks to challenge his Honour's verdict and judgment is that there was no material before his Honour on which his Honour could find the agreement pleaded by the plaintiff to have been made out.
The materiality of the success of this challenge to the appellant has been explained to us by Mr. Barbour very fully and, for my part, I quite understand what he has said. eee However, notwithstanding his very capable efforts, I have formed the clear opinion that there was ample material before his Honour on which his Honour could have properly found the contract pleaded by the plaintiff to have been made out. Accordingly, in my opinion, this
appeal should be dismissed.
CREST INVESTMENTS PTY. LIMITED
Ve ca JUDGMENT MENZIES J.
'S_PTy.
LIT
DEE
STOSSE:
I agree.
CREST TNVESTMENTS PTY.
LIMITED
STOSSEL
OWEN Se
CREST INV: 2S Pty.
LIMTPED
STOSSEL
I agree.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate