ISAACS V. ISAACS; ISAACS V. ISAACS & ANOR

WE ECT YL

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

ISAACS

Vv. ISAACS & ANOR.

nb Go ks a, on... MONDAY,,..43th. OCTOBER y 4947...

cze80/45

ISAACS __v SAACS

ISAACS __v SAACS_& ANOR

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT. LATHAM C.J RICH J.

STARE J. DIXON J.

WILLIAMS J.

TSAACS ov CS

ISAACS v, ISAACS & ANOR.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT. LATHAM C.J. RICH J. BTARKE J. ON J.

WILLIAMS J.

These two appeals from orders. of the Bankruptey Court have been called on for hearing. The appellant appears in person. There is no material before the Court upon which it is possible to proceed with the hearing of the appeals. No trans- eript has been prepared. The orders against which the appeals are made were themselves made on 25th September 1946 and in April of 1947. The grounds of the appeals are, as appears from the notices of appeal, most confused. There appears to be no substance in the second appeal whatever, in as mch as by effluxion of time the appellant has received the certificate of discharge to which that appeal relates. The result is that the appellant comes before the Court without any material upon which the hearing of the appeals can proceed and, further, that no explanation 1s given of the absence of the material and the failure to comply with the rules of court.

The appellant applies for an adjournment. There is no reason to believe that the position would be improved if an adjournment were granted. The application for an adjournment is refused as no grounds have been shown for it and no explanation has been given of the delay which has taken lace. The appeals being called on and there being no material upon which it is Possible even to suggest that the orders made were wrong, the appeals are dismissed.

ORDER.

Appeals dismissed. No order as to costs.