High Court of Australia
ff
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA —
Nos.12 & 20 of 1946
THE STEVEDORING INDUSTRY COW &_OR}
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Judgment delivered at. Sydney...
cxssanyes BB Dass Gon Beste Me on... Wednesday,.4th December, 1946.
BUDDART PARKER LIMITED V. THE STEVEDORING INDUS' AND ORS.
COMMISSTON
No 20 of 1946,
ORDER
Injunction restraining the defendent Commission its members servants and agents until the hearing of the action or further
order from enforcing or in any way giving effect to Order
No. 50 of 1946, Costs reserved.
HUDDART PARKHR LIMITED & ORS V THE STEVEDORING I) COMMISSION & ORS.
No. 19 of 1946,
ORDER,
Injunction restraining the defendant Commission its members sergants and agents until the hearing of the action or further order from making or if already made from enforcing or in any way giving effect to any orders purporting to grant annual
leave with pay to waterside workers.. Costs reserved.
HUDDART PARKER LIMITED & AS
ve
WILLTAMS J.
HUDDART PARIER LIMITED & ORS.
HOS. 19 & 30 of 1946.
JUDGMENT.
These are two applications for interlocutory injunctions which have been heard together made in two actions commenced between the same plaintiffs and defendants, the plaintiffs being companies and a firm engaged in the business of shipping or stevedoring or bath and employing waterside workers in various ports in Australia in connection with their businesses, and the original defendants being the Stevedoring Industry Commission and the Commomrealth of Australia. On the hearing of the applications the Waterside Workers' Federation of Australia applied for leave to intervene in both actions and was added as a defendant to both actions without objection. The injunction claimed in Action No. 19 is an injunction restraining the defendant Commission from making or implementing or enforcing any order or orders purporting to grant annual leave with full pay to waterside workers in the waterfront industry until the trial of this action or further order. The injunction claimed in Action No. 20 is an injunction restraining the same defendant from implementing or enforcing or giving effect to Order No. 50 of 1946 made by the defendant commission on the 26th day of November 1946 until the trial of this action or further order.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate