High Court of Australia
Me. | off 1778 ye
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
~——-WALTER_H._WRIGHT_PTY
OF AUSTRALIA
asia
op'®
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Judgment delivered at..MELBOURNE W. M. Houszox, Gort. Print, Melb. _ on TUESDAY, "TH MARCH, 1958.
C1978 /58
WALTER H. WRIGHT PTY. LID.
v.
NAUBURAS AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
'ORDER
Appeal dismissed with costs.
WALTER H. WRIGHT PTY. LTD.
ve
NAUBURAS AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
TRENT JUDGMENT OF THE COURT ORAL ' DELIVERED BY DIXON C.J.
CORAM: DIXON C.J. WILLIAMS J. WEBB J. FULLAGAR J. TAYLOR J.
WALTER H, WRIGHT PTY, LTD,
ve
NA AND CO) |ALTH OF AUSTRALIA
We have all reached the conclusion that this appeal should be dismissed and I shall state our reasons very shortly. The case for the appellant has been fully argued and no advantage would be obtained by making a detailed statement of the facts. The question at issue comes before us in what is, perhaps, an 'unusual way. The plaintif?, who is not a party to the appeal, sued two defendants, one being the Commonwealth and the other the appellant company. Part of the business of the latter is the using of mobile cranes for the lifting of heavy weights.
The plaintiff is the administratrix of Martin Nauburas who was killed as he was attempting to lift a heavy weight with the aid of his employer's crane. The accident took place on land belonging to, or at all events occupied by, the Commonwealth.
As administratrix of her deceased husband's estate the plaintiff sued under Lord Campbell's Act both Walter H. Wright Proprietary Limited and the Commonwealth as defendants, the cause of action being, stated broadly, in negligence.
A verdict was found for the plaintiff against both defendants, the damages awarded as apportioned being £4000 against the defendant appellant, Walter H. Wright Proprietary Limited, and £2000 against the defendant respondent, the Commonwealth.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate