IN THE MATTER OF LETTERS PATENT NOS. 112379, 112550 AND 112570 GRANTED TO E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO. AND ASSIGNED TO IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED 13/1955 | Legal Lookup
IN THE MATTER OF LETTERS PATENT NOS. 112379, 112550 AND 112570 GRANTED TO E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO. AND ASSIGNED TO IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED 13/1955
High Court of Australia
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
i GA Bh. o%6 IES a i
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
IN_THE MATTER. OF LETTE!
NOS. 1123795 112550 AND wise '
GRANTED TO BE. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS.
& CO. AND ASSIGNED TO IMPERIAL
CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Judgment delivered at... MELBOURNE...
W. M. Houston, Govt. Print., Melb.
cm: O™ ms Gort. Print Melb, con...... THURSDAY ,...257TH. OCTOBER,..19.56.
IN THE MATTER OF LETTERS PATENT NOS.112379,
112550 and 112570 GRANTED TO E.I. DE PONT DE
NEMOURS & CO. AND ASSIGNED TO IMPERIAL CHEMICAL
INDUSTRIES LIMITED.
JUDGMENT TAYLOR J.
\
\
i
i
1.
|
I a ata it
IN THE MATTER OF LETTERS PATENT NOS. 112579,
112550 and 112570 GRANTED TO E. I. DE PONT DE
NEMOURS & CO. AND ASSIGNED TO IMPERIAL CHEMICAL
INDUSTRIES LIMITED. |
JUDGMENT
At the conclusion of the hearing of this matter I
had formed the view, notwithstanding the objections which
had been raised, that the applicants had made out a case for
an extension for a substantial period of the respective terms of
the Letters Patent the subject of the application. The
appropriate period of the extension, I thought, should be
from four to five years in each case. I reserved the
matter for consideration, however, first of all because it
was suggested that it might be proper to make any regrants
in a limited form and subject to an undertaking designed to
ensure the granting of gratuitous licences in the event of
British Nylon Spinners Limited being unable at any time to
satisfy the local demand for goods manufactured under the
patented processes, and secondly, because it was also 4
suggested that I might express some final views upon questions
which seemed to me to be, at the most, on the fringe of the
case.
Upon consideration I am satisfied that the regrants
should not be subject to any limitation or undertaking and,
further, that it is not an appropriate case in which to deal
with the questions referred to.
The evidence establishes to my satisfaction that the
successive patentees suffered war loss which, when expressed
in terms of time, amounted to a period somewhat in excess of
five years. Other factors exist, however, which, at this
stage, require this period to be discounted in some small
measure. In all the circumstances I think that the appropriate
period is five years and I direct that there be a regrant of
each of the Letters Patent for that period computed, of course,
from the date of their expiry. The regrant will be subject
to conditions that no action or other proceedings shall be
commenced or prosecuted and that no damage shall be recovered
either in respect of any infringement of any of the patents
which has taken place after the date of the expiration
of the original term and before the date of this order, or
in respect of the sale, use or employment at any time
hereafter of any article actually made in that period in
accordance with the invention covered by the respective
patents.
I direct the applicant to pay the Commissioner's
costs of this application, including any reserved costs.
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.