High Court of Australia
THE HIGH COURI OF AUSTRALIA (72
SIMPSON
ORIGINAL
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
SIMPSON v. BLACK
JUDGMENT McTIERNAN J. (ORAL)
SIMPSON _v,. BLACK
ORDER
Verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $12,600 with costs for the plaintiff. Usual order as to exhibits.
SIMPSON v. BLACK
At the hearing of this matter the main issue in controversy was whether, as a result of the defendant's negligence, the plaintiff suffered brain damage in addition to the other injuries and substantial pecuniary loss. As regards the former, I am satisfied on the evidence (documentary and oral) that the laceration of the plaintiff's left forehead and temple was accompanied by some concussion resulting in minimal cerebral injury.
In assessing damages I cannot exclude from consideration that on the evidence the plaintiff suffered a diminution of earning capacity as a result of the accident. I think therefore that an amount for pecuniary loss should be an element in the general damages.
The major element is, of course, the plaintiff's personal loss, due to the laceration and scarring resulting therefrom, and to the continuing effect of the slight concussion accompanying the laceration,
It is a difficult task, in all the circumstances of the case, to assess adequate and fair compensation for the damage to the plaintiff.
I have come to the conclusion that the sum of $11,500 is a just amount to award the plaintiff as general damages.
It is agreed between the parties that the proper amount to award for special damages is $1,100.
I therefore find a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $12,600. I give judgment for that
amount with costs for the plaintiff.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate