High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
TOOHEY J. RE AUSTRALIAN BANK EMPLOYEES UNION RESPONDENT
EX PARTE ILLATON PTY. LTD. AND ANOR APPLICANTS/PROSECUTORS
ORDER
Applications for writs of prohibition and certiorari dismissed.
Order made: 5 October 1990
Reasons for judgment delivered: 30 October 1990
S.90/006 Solicitors for the First Applicant/Prosecutor: Cooke & Cussen Solicitors for the Second Applicant/Prosecutor: Henderson Trout
Solicitors for the Respondent: Maurice Blackburn & Co.
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law
Reports.
TOOHEY J. Illaton Pty. Ltd. ("Illaton") is a company incorporated in Queensland. The Metway Group Staff Association ("the Staff Association") is an unincorporated association whose members are employees of Illaton. To understand why they are both applying to the Court for prerogative relief, it is necessary to mention Metway Bank Limited ("Metway") which is a public company, also incorporated in Queensland, and was formerly the Metropolitan Permanent Building Society ("the Building Society"). Illaton is a wholly owned subsidiary of Metway.
Metway does not employ staff, nor did the Building Society. Since December 1970 all staff engaged in connection with the Building Society were employed by Metropolitan Managers Pty. Ltd. which, on 19 August 1987, changed its name to Austman Pty. Ltd. ("Austman"). Austman is also a wholly owned subsidiary of Metway. Illaton agreed to supply labour to Austman to enable Austman to provide administrative and other services which Austman had contracted to provide to Metway.
On 3 October 1990 Illaton sought the issue of an order nisi for a writ of prohibition and writ of certiorari directed to Deputy President MacBean of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission. When the matter came on for hearing on 5 October, the Staff Association made a similar application. At the end of the hearing on 5 October I refused both applications and said I would give my reasons in writing; these are my reasons.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate