High Court of Australia
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA "
QUEENSLAND REGT SPRY @ >: —_ Appeal No, 1 of 19)
ON APPEAL FROM (Hi FULL COURT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
BELWERN: DAPHNY PBARL CACTANACH CP Laintife
Appellant and
PATRICK Pi ROBERT JAME
WDGAR DAVID Defendants)
Respondents
JUDGMENT |
if)
PSL5 47.
~ DMO 1EB4 BRISBANE REGISTRY.
WONDAT town Agents ;-
LEONARD POWER & POWER Solicitors
Metropolitan Life Building yueen jtreet
Brisbane
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND REGISTRY Appeal No, 1 of 1964
BETWEEN:
DAPHNE PEARL CATTANACH Plaintiff Appellant and
PATRICK PERCIVAL PENDERGAST
ROBERT JAMES MORELAND and EDGAR DAVID LAWS
Defendants )
Respondents
ON APPEAL FHOM THE FULL COURT OF THE SUPREME COURT
BEFORE THEIR HONOURS - THE CHIEF JUSTICE (SIR GARFIELD BARWICK), MR. JUSTICE KITTO, MR. JUSTICE TAYLOR, MR. JUSTICE
WINDEYEH, MR. JUSTICE OWEN
BRISBANE, WEDNESDAY THE THIRD DAY OF JUNE, 1964
THIS APPEAL coming on to be mentioned before the Court this day at Brisbane UPON APPLICATION made by Mr. Mylne of Counsel on behalf of the Appellant that the said Appeal by consent be struck out and UPON HEARING Mr. O'Sullivan of Counsel for the Respondents BY CONSENT fHIs COURT DOTH ORDER that the Appeal be struck out AND the sum of FIFTY POUNDS (£50.0.0) paid into the Registry of this Honourable Court by the Appellant as security for the costs of the Appeal be paid to LEONARD POWER & POWER, Solicitors, Town Agents for J.R. CARY Solicitor for the Appellant.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate