High Court of Australia
a a
THE MANTLE LAMP CO, OF AMERICA & ALADDIN INDUSTRIRS LTD
Patent No 718 of 1911
Judgment Bs; tarke J. VE pork 9 7.
I @AMMA Ghant an oxtension of this patent until the
Q2ad Auguet 1930, which the petitioners suggest is the date fixed
by an order of the High Court of Justice in Eagiand for the expit- ation of the Baglish Pateat covering substantially the same invention @etAs the Australian patent has expired,the extension will take the form of a new grant to the Aladdin Industries Ltd. from the date of # the expiration of the Australian Patent No 712 of 1911for a term eagm
Gypiring on the ao August 1930, subject to the usual provisions by way, of protection a respect of the period betioer the expiration of 4
aN ; the patent and the ante of this order. Thig is in accordance with +
the Baglish- practice, whichI adopt.See Bektfingtonts Boilers Ltd. j
36 R.P.C.p.349; Casmey's Patentg 40 R.P.C.p.99; Kay & Foxwells }
es
Patent 42 R.P.C, p.222; Morrisons Patent 42 R.P.C. p.511; West-
morelands" 2 R.P.C.p. 513.
The usual provisions by way of protection may be found in
the order made by me in sonneqtion with Lumieres Patent.
The petitioner must pay tng S Von Sotoner of Patents qeasa " this petition. 5
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate