High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GUMMOW J
McKEWINS HAIRDRESSING AND
BEAUTY SUPPLIES PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) APPLICANT
AND
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION FIRST RESPONDENT
WAYNE LEVICK SECOND RESPONDENT
McKewins Hairdressing and Beauty Supplies Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
[2000] HCA 27
5 May 2000
S123/1999
ORDER
1. The notice of motion filed 1 May 2000 is dismissed.
2. The document described as a notice of discontinuance, which was filed on 1 May 2000, is set aside.
3. The notice of motion for removal filed on 29 July 1999 is amended to add Wayne Levick as second respondent but is then dismissed.
4. The second respondent, Mr Levick, is to bear the costs of the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation of and incidental to his two motions and of Mr Levick's motion filed on 1 May 2000. Such costs are to be taxed on the basis, in each case, that the costs include all costs except in so far as they are of an unreasonable amount or were unreasonably incurred so that, subject to such exceptions, the Deputy Commissioner is completely indemnified by Mr Levick for the Deputy Commissioner's costs.
5. Certify that these motions were a matter proper for the attendance of counsel in chambers.
2.
6. Otherwise dismiss the Deputy Commissioner's motions filed on 2 February 2000 and 27 April 2000.
Representation:
No appearance for McKewins Hairdressing and Beauty Supplies Pty Ltd (In Liquidation)
R G Orr QC with G L Ebbeck for the first respondent (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor)
D C Fitzgibbon for the second respondent (instructed by Wayne Levick & Associates)
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
McKewins Hairdressing and Beauty Supplies Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
High Court – Practice and procedure – Removal of causes – Constitutional arguments raised in application untenable – Application made on instructions of a third party to the litigation – Solicitor's duties to Court.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate