High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
CALLINAN J
ARUNDEL CHIROPRACTIC CENTRE PTY LTD APPLICANT
AND
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION RESPONDENT
Arundel Chiropractic Centre Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
[2001] HCA 26
16 February 2001
B61/1999
ORDER
1. Application removed.
2. Institute of Taxation Research Pty Limited joined as a party to the proceedings.
3. Institute of Taxation Research Pty Limited to pay the costs of the respondent, including costs of the proceedings seeking joinder.
Representation:
A J H Morris QC with A Julian-Armitage for the applicant (instructed by Rea & Sockhill)
P V Slattery with G L Ebbeck for the respondent (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor)
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CALLINAN J.
The facts
1. On 30 June 1999, the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation issued and served a statutory demand on the applicant pursuant to s 459E of the Corporations Law. It required payment of unpaid tax and additional tax for late payment in the sum of $8001.14. The applicant did not comply with the statutory demand. On 15 July 1999 the applicant filed an Originating Application in the Supreme Court of Queensland seeking to set the demand aside pursuant to s 459G of the Corporations Law. The matter came on before Muir J on 4 August 1999. His Honour ordered that the application be dismissed with costs. His Honour stated:
"My reasons for the orders are those given in the matter of Kevjen Pty Ltd[1] which apply equally to this matter."
In that case, his Honour stated that the grounds of appeal in Kevjen were the same as in this case[2]:
"The principal one is that there is a genuine dispute as to the existence of the debt [arising out of an income tax assessment under the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth)]. The dispute is said to arise as a result of the applicant's assertion that the Constitution is legislation of a foreign power, namely, that of the United Kingdom.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate