High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
McHUGH, GUMMOW, KIRBY, HAYNE AND CALLINAN JJ
ANGUS CLAYMORE PILMER & ORS APPELLANTS
AND
THE DUKE GROUP LIMITED
(IN LIQUIDATION) & ORS RESPONDENTS
Pilmer v The Duke Group Limited (in liq) [2001] HCA 31
31 May 2001
A46/1999
ORDER
1. Appeal allowed with costs. 2. Set aside pars 2, 7, 9 and 10 of the orders made by the Full Court of the Supreme Court of South Australia on 13 August 1999 but only to the extent that those orders affect the parties to the appeal to this Court. 3. Remit the matter to the Full Court of the Supreme Court of South Australia for the making of orders consistent with this Court's reasons for decision.
On appeal from the Supreme Court of South Australia
Representation:
A J Myers QC with P Zappia for the appellants (instructed by Phillips Fox) at the hearing on 7 April 2000
T A Gray QC with R J Whitington QC, S J Lipman and S J Doyle for the first respondent (instructed by Fisher Jeffries) at the hearing on 7 April 2000
A J Myers QC with G T Pagone QC and P Zappia for the appellants (instructed by Phillips Fox) at the hearing on 23 November 2000
R J Whitington QC with S J Lipman and S J Doyle for the first respondent (instructed by Fisher Jeffries) at the hearing on 23 November 2000
No appearance for the second to seventh respondents.
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Pilmer v The Duke Group Limited (in liquidation)
Contract – Breach – Damages – Calculation of loss – Contract of retainer for valuation of subject of takeover bid – Plaintiff company effected takeover in reliance on valuation made in breach of duty of care – Had valuation been accurate plaintiff would not have proceeded – Consideration included cash and issue and allotment of shares – Whether plaintiff suffered loss by issue of shares – Whether damages include sum representing market value of shares issued under agreement.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate