High Court of Australia
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GLEESON CJ,
GAUDRON, McHUGH, GUMMOW, KIRBY, HAYNE AND CALLINAN JJ
MELVILLE ROBERT MARSHALL APPELLANT
AND
DIRECTOR-GENERAL, RESPONDENT
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT
Marshall v Director-General, Department of Transport
[2001] HCA 37
21 June 2001
B52/2000
ORDER
1. Appeal allowed with costs including reserved costs.
2. Set aside the orders made by the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland on 22 October 1999, and in place thereof, order that:
(a) the appeal to that Court be allowed with costs;
(b) the order of the Land Appeal Court made on 24 July 1998 be set aside;
(c) the application dismissed by the Land Appeal Court be remitted to that Court to be dealt with in accordance with law.
On appeal from the Supreme Court of Queensland
Representation:
D F Jackson QC with D A Kelly for the appellant (instructed by James Conomos Lawyers)
P A Keane QC, Solicitor-General for the State of Queensland with R S Jones for the respondent (instructed by Crown Solicitor for Queensland)
Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.
CATCHWORDS
Marshall v Director-General, Department of Transport
Real property – Resumption of land by public body – Compensation – Whether compensation for injurious affection is payable in respect of land taken for the statutory purpose but not, or not yet, physically used for that purpose.
Words and phrases – "injurious affection" – "compensation" – "depreciation" – "severed land" – "residual land" – "road purposes".
Acquisition of Land Act 1967 (Q), ss 4, 7, 12, 20.
Land Act 1962 (Q) ss 44, 45.
Land Clauses Consolidation Act 1845 (UK), s 63.
Lands Acquisition Act 1955 (Cth), s 23.
GLEESON CJ, GUMMOW, KIRBY AND CALLINAN JJ.
The issue
1. The issue in this appeal is whether compensation for injurious affection payable to a dispossessed landowner pursuant to s 20 of the Acquisition of Land Act 1967 (Q) ("the Act") is restricted to compensation for the impact of the work done on the actual land taken, and the precise use to which that land is put.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate